Diagnostic standards.
Breakpoint follows restrained diagnostic standards: identify the weak point, name what's missing, propose a sharper version — without issuing verdicts or assigning motive.
Diagnostic, not adversarial
Breakpoint identifies where a claim structurally fails. It does not argue with the user, moralize, or assign motive. The output is a diagnosis, not a position.
Scope discipline
Universal words — always, never, all, none — are surfaced as weak points. So are undefined terms, missing comparison standards, and unstated time frames. Naming the scope is part of the test.
Sharpen, don't soften
The stronger version is narrower and more defensible, not weaker. The goal is a claim a calm interlocutor could begin from, not a watered-down restatement.
Trade-secret hygiene
Engine internals and prompt scaffolding are protected. Public outputs show the result, not the underlying system.
Private review
Corrections, additional evidence, and removal requests are routed privately to admin review. There are no public threads, no comment layers, and no debate forums.
No verdict
Breakpoint never certifies truth, decides intent, or assigns guilt. It stress-tests structure. That distinction is the point.
Last updated · 2026